Measuring Success in Child Welfare















Click here if you need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the PDF files.
   

 

 


Assessing Client Satisfaction

Measures of client satisfaction are a valuable source of feedback for practitioners, administrators and policy makers on service efficacy and provision dimensions (such as cultural sensitivity and client involvement in decision making). Although a family member's level of satisfaction with a service or provider is not always a definitive measure of service quality, it does serve as a valuable resource in understanding and evaluating the effects of services on children and families and can enrich and assist in the interpretation of administrative and clinical outcome information. For example, if clients in a particular neighborhood are increasingly unable to meet their goals, a client satisfaction survey might reveal that the closest substance abuse treatment center doesn't provide day care or doesn't serve women. A survey of clients in another neighborhood demonstrating family reunification increases might reveal an excellent public transportation system and family oriented outpatient services. How agencies decide to link client satisfaction to other outcome measurement information will depend upon the purpose of the analysis.

Several resources are available to assist clients in the selection, development and/or administration of client satisfaction measures. Measurement of Client Satisfaction: The State of the Art (Harris and Poertner, 1998) (See cfrcwww.social.uiuc.edu/pubs/pubs1.htm) focuses on the identification of recent measures of client satisfaction and examines them in terms of their ability to reflect clients' actual needs, the dimensions of satisfaction they are intended to measure, and their ability to obtain useful data from clients. The authors identified 34 client satisfaction studies published between 1990 and 1996 and categorized the instruments used in these studies by:

  • Source employed to develop the instrument (clients, professionals, or the professional literature)

  • Types of services that were evaluated

  • Dimensions of satisfaction

Methodological issues concerning the measurement of client satisfaction are also discussed. Managers may find the following additional references useful in their work.

Additional References for 
Assessing Client Satisfaction

Aldgate, J., Stein, M., & Carey, K. (1989). The contribution of young people and their families towards improving foster family care. In J. Aldgate, A. Maluccio, & C. Reeves (Eds.), Adolescents in foster families, (pp. 61-76). Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.  

Allen, R. I., & Petr, C.G. (1996). Toward developing standards and measurements for family centered practice in family support programs. In G.H.S. Singer, L.E. Powers, & A.L. Olson (Eds.), Redefining family support: Innovations in public-private partnerships. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

            Attkinsson, C.C. & Greenfield, T.K. (1994). Client satisfaction questionnaire - 8 and service satisfaction scale - 30. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Barth, R.P. (1990). On their own: The experience of youth after foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 7(5), 419-440.

Burchard, J. & Bruns, E. (1993). Youth satisfaction/involvement and unconditional care questionnaire. A user's guide to weekly adjustment indicator checklist. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology.

Bush, M. & Gordon, A.C. (1982). The case for involving children in child welfare decisions. Social Works, 4, 309-14.

Carrizosa, S., Poertner, J., & Knutson, L. (19__). Home Visitor Satisfaction Survey. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, School of Social Welfare.

Colton, M. (1989). Foster and residential children's perceptions of their social environments. British Journal of Social Work, 19, 217-233.

Curran, M. & Pecora, P. (1994). Involving youth in family foster care in consumer evaluation studies: A literature review and sample questions. Seattle, WA: The Casey Family Program.

Ellsworth, R. B. (1975). Consumer feedback in measuring the effectiveness of mental health programs. In M. Guttentag & E.L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.

Festinger, T. (1983). No one ever asked us.A postscript to foster care. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Garbarino, J., Stott, F.M., & the Erickson Institute (1989). What children can tell us. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, Inc.

Godley, S. H. (1995). Plan for statewide parental and youth consumer satisfaction survey. Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Institute.

Grimes, S. (1996). Parent Satisfaction Survey: Residential program. Park Ridge, IL: The Youth Campus.

Grimes, S. (1996). Parent Satisfaction Survey: Treatment foster care. Park Ridge, IL: The Youth Campus.

Hampson, R. B. & Tavormina, J.B. (1980). Feedback from the experts: A study of foster mothers. Social Work, 25(2), 108-113.

Johnson, P., Yoken, C., & Voss, R. (1995). Family foster care placement: The child's perspective. Child Welfare, 74(5), 959-974.

LeProhn, N. & Pecora, P. (1994). The Casey Foster Parent Study: Research summary. Seattle, WA: The Casey Family Program.

Nguyen, T.D., Attkisson, C.C., & Stegner, B.L. (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6, 299-213.

Pecora, P., Bartlome, J.A., Magana, V.L., & Sperry, C.K. (1991). How consumers view intensive family preservation services. In M.W. Fraser, P.J. Pecora, & D.A. Haapala, (Eds.), Families in Crisis, (pp. 273-288). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Pamperin, B.F. & Bailey, B. Parent Education Program Evaluation. Menomorrie, WI: University of Wisconsin, Department of Social Science.

Reid, P.N. & Gundlach, J.H. (1993). A scale for the measurement of consumer satisfaction with social services. Journal of Social Service Research, 7(1), 37-54

Southward, K. K. (1995). Community Treatment Home Program Evaluation Staff Input Survey for Youths. Chicago, IL: Children's Home & Aid Society of Illinois.

Southward, K. K. (1995). Community Treatment Home Program Evaluation 1996 Client Satisfaction Survey for Youths. Chicago, IL: Children's Home & Aid Society of Illinois.

Southward, K.K. (1995). Design overview of the Parent Survey for CHASI Child Day Care Programs. Chicago, IL: Children's Home & Aid Society of Illinois.

Stewart, D.W. & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups, Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

 

  Contacts:

       MichelleJohnson          or       
       (808) 942-4813              
       mjohnson@lava.net

Susan Wells
(217) 244-5252
sjwells@uiuc.edu

       Back to Top

 

Children & Family Research Center, 1203 W. Oregon, Urbana, IL 61801  (217) 333-5837            Webmaster ccutter@uiuc.edu
                                                           10/20/00

our school